ILLUSTRATIVE DEMO · FICTIONAL ORGANISATION, VENDOR AND EVIDENCE · NO LIVE MONITORING

Decision Continuity · PROVE TDI

Your technology decision was right. Is it still right 12 months later?

Your vendors change. Technology evolves. Contracts approach renewal. Prove TDI keeps the original evidence and decisions available for review, so you can assess what changed and what to do next.

Know what was decided. Understand what changed. Prepare the next decision.

Discuss an enterprise pilot

Without retained decision intelligence

Reconstruct earlier assumptions, chase evidence and revisit old questions when renewal approaches.

With Prove TDI

Keep the original decision, review new evidence, compare outcomes and prepare the next decision.

The value continues after the purchase: retained decision records, evidence reviews, outcome checks and renewal preparation. Illustrated ongoing workflow; automated notifications are not yet a live feature.

See how the story changes over 12 months

Five moments that affect the same original decision.

Month 0 · 14 Jan 2026 (fictional)

Initial decision signed

What materially changed

Accountable buyer signs the selection of Aster Metrics (fictional). Evidence version locked.

Why it matters

Every later change is measured against this immutable baseline.

Original (v1)Updated (SAMPLE)
No prior decisionDecision NB-OCC-001 v1 recorded
Confidence
Moderate
Limitation
Interoperability claims are vendor-stated, not tested.
Owner
Elena Marsh (fictional), Head of Workplace Strategy, accountable buyer
Action required
None. Expectations and unknowns recorded.

Decision Ledger result: v1 signed and locked with source snapshot SS-001.

What retained context changes at renewal

The contrast above in detail: what the ledger keeps, so renewal starts from evidence rather than reconstruction.

Without retained context

  • Original evidence not reliably known; vendor documents may have changed
  • Owners of each concern reconstructed from email and memory
  • Connector deprecation discovered at renewal, if at all
  • No link between expected and observed outcomes
  • Additional reconstruction needed before renewal can be reviewed

With PROVE TDI (illustrated)

  • Source snapshot SS-001 retained with the signed v1 decision
  • Named owners for procurement, security and KPIs
  • Evidence deltas recorded as contradictions, not overwrites
  • KPI traceability from expectation to observation to human review
  • Renewal framed as a versioned follow-up with open gates visible

Qualitative illustration only. No time or cost savings are claimed.

Why an ongoing relationship matters

Ongoing intelligence, outcome verification by accountable people and decision retention. Commercially independent: vendors cannot pay for ranking, evidence weight, leads, shortlist inclusion or access to buyers.

Currently available product functions

Intelligently maintained context

Decision Ledger records, source snapshots and evidence provenance.

Currently available product functions

Periodic outcome re-evaluation

Decision-bound outcome expectations, observations and human approval.

Illustrated ongoing workflow

Governed change review

Reviewing vendor and evidence changes against the signed version.

Future / subject-to-scope automation

Preparedness for renewal

Automated detection and alerting of changes ahead of renewal.

See PROVE TDI pricing

Your first decision is only the starting point

This is why decision intelligence remains valuable after procurement: retained evidence, governed change review and accountable outcome measurement.

PROVE TDI Technology Decision Intelligence